Get Widget

Dakota Fanning in New Moon

281 Votes
  • Start Date:
    1-23-2009
  • Last Vote:
    10-12-2009

Description:

Dakota Fanning, who turns 15 next month, has reportedly been offered the villainous role of Jane, a petite, yet deadly member of Italy’s Volturi coven in the film adaptation of author Stephenie Meyer’s second book, New Moon. Apparently there were no auditions, they just offered it to her outright, and now they’re in negotiations.

ShockTillYouDrop.com spoke with Fanning and she confirmed she is circling the film. "I really hope that works out," she says. "I think it's too soon to tell right now, but it'd be really fun. I'm a huge fan."

Do you think Dakota Fanning would be right for the role of Jane?  If not, who would?

Dakota Fanning

62%
38%
Tell a FriendCreate a CampaignBookmark

First off she cant look 10-ll becuz children vampires were not allowed so u need to find a short (women) thats has childish features but evil features to pull off the jane act... AND NOBODY ANYBODY US VIEWERS NO CUZ THAT (RUINS THE SERIES!!!)

NOT DAKOTA FANNING!!!!!!!!!!!! Find some unknown actress that is like 8-10. She has to look like an evil kid (maybe give her a black bob), yet at the same time she has to look innocent.

I might be able to imagine Dakota Fanning as Jane if her hair was a black bob and her voice a little more villainous.

no i dont think she should play jane because she is being portrayed as being tough and mean with her powers dakota dosent have the look and i dont think she can pull it off

ok, firs off jane is supposed to be younger... don't comment unless you've read the books

"At first I thought it was a young boy. The newcomer was as tiny as Alice, with lank, pale brown hair trimmed short. The body under the cloak-which was darker, almost black- was slim and androgynous. But the face was too pretty for a boy. The wide-eyed, full-lipped face would make a Botticelli angel look like a gargoyle. Even allowing for the dark crimson irises."

"Her size was so insgnificant that the reaction to her appearance confused me."

"... her childish voice was monotone."

so, i don't know she could probably pull it off but i honestly couldnt care, for me the movie ruined the books so its kindof just whatever- i hope they get better i really do

oh, and by the way she never "wore a short skirt and hose" read the books all these "twilight fans" are annoying- if you cared at all about twilight you'd take time to check facts

no way
Jane flirts with Edward to much
Dakota Fanning iz to little to play that part
someone else should do it! like the girl who played in
Step up 2 the streets names Andie shes very pretty but i dont knw who i invisioned but ill think of someone & get bk to ya kk? PEACE LOVE

NO.......
are kiding me....
janes not 2....
and she flirts with edward and robberts not like some four year old whose interested i mean come on dakota fanning eeeewww.....get somebody like i dont now any body but her.....
i mean edwards so freakin gorgeouse and shes not....
hhhmmmmm...
yew knowhat yew should get one of the olsen twins....
one ofthem would good.....

good actress just don't know if she be the right person for the role of jane

No, that's insane. She's a great actor but she's farrrr too young. She could not pull it off!
And it would be stupid bringing really famous actors, it would ruin the series!

I think she would be perfect, she has played roles in horror movies before and i think that she is an extremly tallented actress.
i can just see her with a little smug evil smile.
Brilliant
:D

ok first off jane isnt supposed to be like 10 or 11 cuz in the book it says shes wearing a short skirt with hose and a sweater...AND she flirts with edward...second i dont like dakota fanning at all...third there are plenty other actresses that could do much better....pick some one like emily browning or cassie for jane...they would look alot better and could pull the sexy part of the caracter out when fanning cant...

I think she'd be OKAY...she's pretty, but I don't think she's exactly right. but i can't think of any other actresses (mostly cas i don't know any to begin with)

I just think that Jane is supposed to look younger, mabey 10 or 11, and that is what is so scary about her.

She isn't who I invisioned as Jane. Sorry Dakota. :]

I thank that she would good for the part! I hope that she will get it! She looks perfect for the part to! Her complection. She doesnt seem like the type of person to play a mean vampire role but I am sure that she can play it off.

WELL SHE IS A GOOD ACTOR BUT THATS NOT HER MOVIE

I also forgot to say that. To make her look the part I do think that she would "ofcourse" need contacts, darker hair, and the right make-up. I think we all saw her in Hide-and-Seek, she had black hair. I think she'll pull of the "evil but angelic" look that Jane has. No matter how experienced she is i'm sure that that fact will only boost her chance of making the character better, since she's so phenominal when it comes to getting into character.
So my vote is a billion times YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think she'd be perfect for the role of Jane! She's an amazing actress and i think it would give proof to everyone that she can accomplish any role put infront of her. And i mean when you see her in other movies she has the certain draw, that makes you interested, and i think that exactly what the character of Jane does. Jane is the one that most of the other characters are cautious about, which is why Dakota Fanning would be perfect for New Moon's Jane. She absolutely has the talent, and I know she's able to pull it off completely!

no problem..i think she can handle it...

i think she would be very good for that role, but i can't picture her seeming sadistic. I imagine alec and jane looking something like the twins from hellboy 2, so i guess she sorta fits the profile

after reading the book, and imaging what Jane whould look like, i think Dekota would not make a good Jane, if she dyed her hair darker, and wore some contacts or something she may, just be ALRIGHT, for the part.

dakota is really pretty and i think she would be good for jane ...BUT!...she has to act exactlly like jane in the book(hint:she has to be cool but in command)she better be thanking me for my vote of a yes because i prefere the book better and think that the movie sucks compared th the book and gives twilight a bad name!

only if she died her hair darker.. then she'd be ok.
i agree with Karlee R. someone unknown would be good.

I think AnnaSophia Robb would be a better choice to play Jane

I don't think so...
I think it would've been better if they casted someone unknown,because then they would've been able to let that person shine,and we would be able to see Jane's character well because we would see Jane instead of the actress playing her.

And besides,they shouldn't have wasted money on that big of a star.They could've used the money for CGI's.

I don't mean to degrade Dakota's prettines but I think she lacks the alluring angelic vampiric beauty the little girl(Jane) from hell has.Someone wampy-er,more luminous,and beautiful would do.

Dakota is a very awsome actress. she would be ok to play jane, but it would be nice if she had black hair not blonde.
it would make her look more evil.( as in the role as jane.!!!)

JANE NEEDS BLACK HAIR! DAKOTA LOOKS NOTHING LIKE HER IN MY HEAD! GET OUT! GET OUT!! GET OUT!!!

Plus, I don't think that she could be evil enough... even thought she's such a good actress. I still can't see her playing it though!

it ok but ya isnt jane older than 15?

I never really thought about who could play Jane, but Dakota is an amazing actress and she gorgeous, so i think she will pull it off

dokota fanning is too young to play this part but
if there wasnt anyother people to play i guess you
can try to make it work just try to search for more
people that are older fit better with the part

Loading People...