32 Votes
- Start Date:
6-9-2008 - Last Vote:
10-19-2009
Description:
Sexual intercourse should be between two people who love each other and are married. Sexual intercourse is a spiritual bond between lovers; saying that they're the only one for them and they don't need anyone to complete themselves in that special way. Not two people who love eachother temporarily; not destined to marry the other. ** Choose agree if you believe that sex before marrage is wrong. and disargee if you think people should just have sex whenever they want, making sex just a game.
Sex is a wonderful thing If you just give it away you ruin it for yourself.
Sex before marriage isn't a sin a piece of paper makes no difference, what matters is love and respect for one another and a ceremony and a piece of paper doesn't give you that
Sharon,
Marriage is not just a piece of paper. It is a union that God creates. If you truly love and respect one another, then you can wait until you're married.
Mine your own business. My sex life is my business & not your. Live & let live.
I was taught to wait until marriage,I dated a guy at 24 years old my first time he said he cared,I was waiting until marriage he didn't want too, after he got what he wanted, he dumped me, you see ,not all guys can be trusted, but you have to learn from your mistakes and move on, I waited a whole year until I found my true love, my husband and I have been together for 10 years now, and I am very happy!
Morally and Spiritually, sex is supposed to be for after your married. It says so in the Bible, and that who ever has sex with more than one person is committing adultry, a sin. In this world where right is wrong and wrong is o.k. people need to be careful not to fall into the "me" trap. only thinking about what feels good for them and not what God wants for them. And by the way people who make fun of what is in the Bible, do so because deep in their hearts they know it's wrong, but face it being a sinner is way easier than being a Christian, we Christian's have all those pesky morals.
The bible says a married woman having sex with more than one. Not unmarrried or man. read before you quot.
Joe Jonas Lover even though having sex before marriage is a sin in some peoples books.... it isn't in mine, when you are young, you're supposed to explore your body....if you have pre marital sex, it isn't wrong, you were just curious, now, if you're a sex addict, then, i have no sympathy for you, but, if you aren't...premarital sex is not wrong....
Sex before marriage is wrong, because its a huge sin..besides sleeping with other people could cause death/diseases..does herpes or HPV ring a bell? plus it makes you look like a ****.
Joe Jonas Lover SEX IS USED AFTER YOU ARE MARRIED...BUT, PRE MARITAL SEX ISN'T WRONG... YOU'RE ONLY EXPLORING YOUR OPTIONS WHEN YUO HAVE SEX...IF YOU GET MARRIED AND THEN HAVE SEX FOR THE FIST TIME...THATS YOUR CHOICE..BUT I DON'T THINK ITS WRONG.
MichaelR(B.B.B.09)though i think your asertion that sex without marriage is wrong is a religous based sentament and not grounded in the real world.i dont believe we should minnamize its importance or the conection that it could bring.moreover i believe sex should allways be taken seriously as it comes with great risk and responsabilty.the whole between a man and woman thing below.(nicole c)thats just religouse biggotry.the same kind osama ben laden used to justify his attacks on our country.
Some of what I said was based on my religious beliefs. So just ignore those if you so please, but I did write quite a few statements that were not religious based.
ooooooo engrish.com <-----hilarious website? i think so. haha.
http://www.engrish.com/de tail.php?imagen...
http://www.engrish.com/de tail.php?imagen...
Your choices are kind of biased who says you have to be married for it to be a spiratual bonding
marriage is a spiritual bond between a man and a woman and it's a sacrament! sex is for procreation and the physical bonding between the man and the woman after marriage. if a man and a woman really love each other they look at each other with dignity and they are not after just having sex with the other. that objectifies the other person and abuses their dignity! just like how porn objectifies women! how can a woman be okay with being looked on as a sex object and nothing more? where is human dignity now? are we all just tools? if you really love a person and wish to spend the rest of your life with that person and have kids with that person and that person feels the same way about you then get freakin married! sex is not for outside marriage! as i said before it is for procreation and the physical bonding between a man and woman married to each other! once you put sex under the category of pleasure you have no respect for the person you "love"!
ooooooo engrish.com <-----hilarious website? i think so. haha.
http://www.engrish.com/de tail.php?imagen...
http://www.engrish.com/de tail.php?imagen...
well marrage is a big step in a relationship saying that they will spent the rest of their lives together in love with eachother. but not all people are in love with the person.. their in it for sex. and people wouldn't get married unless they love eachother or they got drunk and didn't know what they were doing or they got the other person pregnant. thats why i believe sex before marrage is wrong.. although i argee with 'Ray E.' and 'cheyenne™ c.' to an extent
I voted that I disagree because if two people are in love, then what's the problem? You don't need a piece of paper that "bonds" you two together to prove that you love each other.
People have a right to do what they please. It's their choice.
People do have a right to do as they please. It's called free will. Just remember that no matter the choice, there will be a consequence.
"what they please". ha. of course sex is just for pleasure, objectifying humans, and abusing human dignity. how could i forget? let's all go look at porn now because who doesn't love looking on human beings as sex objects and nothing more?!
ooooooo engrish.com <-----hilarious website? i think so. haha.
http://www.engrish.com/de tail.php?imagen...
http://www.engrish.com/de tail.php?imagen...
I find this to be a really baited poll, so I didn't vote.
When marriage is regarded as a legal technicality, and theism is regarded as an unproven collection of shared stories and improbabilities, there is no disconnection required between two people who have sex without being married.... or, indeed, without believing in any of the thousands of Gods which humans across the world believe in.
Also, I would like to point out that you posted this in a Human Rights section and now you're talking about(Excuse my ignorance if this is incorrect.) limiting those rights. Just thought you should know.
they do have the right to do it. but i put it in human rights(i also put it under 'justice') because even though they have the right, it doesn't mean its moral. [also read the other comment i posted on this; it explains more]
Moral is irrelevant in this situation. Just because it may be morally wrong to you doesn't mean it's morally wrong to the people doing it. And I did not see the 'Justice' part of the category, so for that i am sorry. But justice too is irrelevant in this situation(Read above comment about morality.). But I am with Cheyenne in a sense. Why do we need pieces of paper to tell us someone is married? Marriage is supposed to be about everlasting love, and I believe a piece of paper can not tell us that. Only the couple can. And I am truly sorry if this next comment of mine is rude or in anyway douche-baggish, but according to my logic, if two people are in love they do not legal papers, meaning they can have sex whenever and where ever(As long as it's appropriate.) they please. Thus making your argument null and void.
If something is morally wrong, it's morally wrong...period. Marriage is not just a piece of paper. If it was, then I would see your point. Marriage is a union created by God. Therefore, it is not just about being in love.