There are absolutely NO risks to the mother during abortion. Japan's version of the AMA refuses to allow young women to take birth control because it "is harmful" but they perform millions of abortions, which is the preferred method of birth control in that country because they think it is healthier. Do some research.

RACIST COWARD BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE ARE USING WALL SEE THROUGH TECHNOLOGIES AND AUDIO LISTENING-IN DEVICES IN CONNIVANCE WITH NEIGHBOURS TO DEHUMANIZINGLY HARASS ASIANS IN THEIR HOMES WAILING SIRENS FROM OUTSIDE EACH TIME ASIANS MAKE ANY LIVING BODY MOVEMENTS IN THEIR OWN OR RENTED HOMES, WAKING, SLEEPING, GOING TO TOILET, EATING, PRAYING, ETC, FOR WOME. BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE ARE ABUSING THEIR UNIFORMS HARASSING ASIAN WOMEN AND MEN, YOUNG AND OLD, TO CREATE DISTURBANCE IN ASIANS LIVES THROUGH THE UNCOUTH RACISM AND JEALOUSY OF LOW CLASS **** BRITISH POLICE HAVING NOTHING ELSE TO DO AND CREATING PURPOSEFUL HARASSMENT ABUSING THEIR UNIFORMS THROUGH SADISTIC BULLYING AGAINST HUMANS. VOLUNTEERS WELCOME TO SHARE THIS INFORMATION WITH OTHERS: RACIAL HARASSMENT IS SERIOUS AND CAUSES ANGER, FEAR, DEPRESSION, CONFUSION, HELPLESSNESS, PHYSICAL AND MENTAL ILLNESSES AFFECTING RELATIONSHIPS OF PEOPLE AT HOME AND WORK. RACISM MEANS DISRUPTION OF FREEDOM. ANTI-CHRIST RACISTS AND THE RACIST POLICE BEHAVING RACISTLY COMMIT PRIVACY AND INFORMATION THEFT, BEHAVING AS CRIMINALS. UK AND CANADIAN POLICE HARASSMENT OF PEOPLE IS SERIOUS DISRUPTION OF FREEDOM AND CAUSES ANGER, FEAR, DEPRESSION, CONFUSION, HELPLESSNESS, PHYSICAL AND MENTAL ILLNESSES AFFECTING RELATIONSHIPS OF PEOPLE AT HOME AND WORK. ANTI-CHRIST POLICE THEMSELVES COMMIT INFORMATION AND PRIVACY THEFT, BEHAVING AS CRIMINALS. RACIST POLICE AND THEIR GUTLESS INSIDERS-INFORMERS EMPOWER THEM TO ABUSE THEIR POWER AND HARASS RACIALIZED MINORITIES. BEWARE OF UGLY STINKING LOW CLASS DISHONEST RACIST ANTI-CHRIST POLICE IN COLONIALIST, CAPITALIST COUNTRIES - PUBLIC SERVANTS IN UNIFORMS SURVIVING ON PUBLIC TAX PAYERS MONEY, BEHAVING AS RACIST SCUM-BAGS AND THE UGLY STINKING LOW CLASS DISHONEST ANTI-CHRIST BRITISH AND CANADIAN WHITE NEIGHBORS BOTH COMMITTING THE SERIOUS CRIME OF PRIVACY THEFT THROUGH ILLEGAL USE OF AUDIO AND WALL-SEE-THROUGH DEVICES IN OTHERS HOMES AND HACKING OF ONLINE INTERNET AND EMAIL AND LANDLINE AND CELL PHONES AND THEFT OF OFFLINE COMPUTER HARD-DRIVES USING EMR AND KEYLOGGER TECHNOLOGIES FROM NEIGHBORHOOD AND CARS OUTSIDE TO ILLEGALLY INFILTRATE INTO PRIVATE OFFLINE PERSONAL COMPUTERS HARD DRIVES IN PEOPLES HOMES. THE RACIST BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE CANNOT BEAR TO BE WATCHED AND THEIR UGLY ANTI-CHRIST DEEDS EXPOSED. THEY FORGET DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE OHTERS DO UNTO YOU. WATCH THE BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE: DISHONEST RACIST ANTI-CHRIST BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE IN UNIFORMS PERPETUATE RACISM IN CONNIVANCE WITH RACIST ANTI-CHRIST DISHONEST BRITISH NEIGHBORS TO ILLEGALLY AND UNWARRANTEDLY USE WALL SEE THROUGH TECHNOLOGY, AUDIO LISTENING IN DEVICES, EMR VAN ECK PHREAKING EQUIPMENT, AND INTERNET, EMAIL, AND LANDLINE AND CELLPHONE TELEPHONE HACKING AGAINST ASIANS IN THEIR HOMES THROUGH WAILING SIRENS FROM OUTSIDE FOR EVERY LIVING BODY MOVEMENT OF ASIANS IN THEIR HOMES. INTERNET AND COMPUTER HACKING AND INFILTRATING INTO OTHERS PRIVACY IS A SERIOUS CRIME. THEY WILL WAIL SIRENS AND HAVE THEIR INSIDERS IN CARS CREATE SOUND DISTURBANCE OF ACCELERATING AND HONKING AND NEIGHBORS BANGING DOORS AND THROWING THINGS EACH TIME THE EXPOSERS OF THEIR UGLY DEEDS MAKE LIVING MOVEMENTS AT HOME EVEN AT NIGHT AND DAY, EVEN DURING TOSSING AND TURNING IN BED, AND EVEN IN TOILET. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE ANTI-CHRIST DISHONEST RACIST BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE IS TO DISHONESTLY MAINTAIN LAW AND ORDER THROUGH ENSURING THAT THE RACIST WHITE DISHONEST BRITISH AND CANADIAN SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DEHUMANIZINGLY DISTURB, INTIMIDATE, AND HARASS ASIAN MEN AND WOMEN IN THEIR HOMES AND ON STREETS, SHOPS, AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT THROUGH THE ILLEGAL USE OF THESE TECHNOLOGIES WITH POLICE CONNIVANCE AND TO INTIMIDATE, HARASS, DISTURB, AND PROVOKE ASIANS WHO REFUSE TO TOLERATE THIS ILLEGAL NONSENSE OF DISHONEST RACIST ANTI-CHRIST BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE IN CONNIVANCE WITH DISHONEST RACIST ANTI-CHRIST BRITISH NEIGHBORS THIS REFLECTS THEIR VAMPIRE CULTURE DEVOID OF INTEGRITY. THEY FORGET THAT 'HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD' - 'THOSE WHO PERPETUATE VAMPIRE CULTURE WILL DIE BY THE VAMPIRE CULTURE'. ABUSING AND DISRESPECTING PRIVACY IS A HEINOUS CRIME. THE CONCEPT BEING PREACHED IS THAT 'WHY DOES ANYONE NEED TO WORRY ABOUT PRIVACY IF THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG'. THIS IS THE ANTI-CHRIST WAYS OF INFILTRATING SCUMBAGS BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE. WHY DOES ANYONE NEED PRIVACY?: WHY DOES EVERYONE DRESS? WHY DOESN'T EVERYONE GO NAKED? LACK OF PRIVACY IS SAME AS WALKING EVERYWHERE NAKED AS A STREAKER! ARE THE BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE PREACHING THE CONCEPT OF EVERYONE BECOMING STREAKERS - NAKED UNCIVILIZED PEOPLE EVERYWHERE IN UK AND CANADA? JUST SO THE BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE CAN RETAIN THEIR ABUSE OF POWER THROUGH PROCLAIMING AN INFLATED, MANUFACTURED, FALSE, SELF-INITIATED SELFISH CONCEPTS OF SO-CALLED TERROR THREATS AND GAME PLAYING WAILING SIRENS AS EMPTY VESSELS MAKING MORE NOISE IN THEIR ILLEGAL ATTEMPT TO CREATE SOCIAL CONTROL THAT IS MAINLY A SOCIAL NUISANCE. ABUSING PRIVACY AND HARASSING HUMANS - LIVING CREATURES OF GOD, IS HARMFUL TO MIND, BODY AND SOUL. THUS, THE BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE HAVE BECOME THE PERFECT ANTI-CHRIST. THEY WILL BE DEBARRED FROM THE KINGDOM OF GOD. EVADING TACTICS SUCH AS WHERE IS GOD, ETC, WILL NOT ABSOLVE THEM OF THEIR SINS AND THE BRITISH POLICE WILL NOT GO UNPUNISHED FOR THEIR HEINOUS CRIMES OF ABUSING PRIVACY. THE POLICE ARE ADDITIONALLY USING HIDDEN LONG-DISTANCE CAMERAS FROM STRATEGIC POSITIONS TO TARGET THOSE WHO EXPOSE THEIR UGLY DEEDS. USING THESE CAMERAS, THEY BEAM THE VIDEO IMAGES TO THEIR POLICE CARS ROAMING WASTEFULLY WITH THEIR BACKS TO THE TARGETTED PEOPLE. HOWEVER, THE FACT THAT THEY ARE COMMITTING THEIR HEINOUS CRIMES OF VIOLATING OTHER HUMANS PRIVACY THROUGH EVIL MEANS AND INSIDER INFORMERS AMID NEIGHBORS REFLECTS THEIR COWARDICE AND STILL MAKES THEM ABSOLUTE LOW CLASS COWARDS COWARDS COWARDS COWARDS. THUS, THE BRITISH AND CANADIAN POLICE ARE THE ANTI-CHRIST COWARDS HARASSING THOSE WHO EXPOSE THE UGLY DEEDS OF POLICE HARASSMENT AND INVASION INTO PRIVACY OF PEOPLE AT HOME AND WORK, THROUGH VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE AUDIO AND VIDEO DEVICES, WALL SEE THROUGH TECHNOLOGIES, OFFLINE COMPUTER HACKING USING KEY LOGGERS AND ELECTRO MAGNETIC RADIATION (EMR) EQUIPMENT TO RETRIEVE IMAGES OF ANYTHING BEING TYPED ON PERSONAL COMPUTERS OFFLINE AT HOME AND WORK, AS WELL AS ONLINE COMPUTER HACKING THROUGH THE INTERNET, THROUGH ILLEGAL ACCESS UNDER THE FALSE PRETEXT OF SURVEILLANCE AND PROTECTION AND SECURITY, THEREBY VIOLATING PEOPLES HUMAN RIGHTS AND PRIVACY, INVADING THEIR LIVES AND CREATING DISTURBANCE AND HARASSMENT THAT WILL WEIGH HEAVILY UPON THEM IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE ALMIGHTY LORD OF CREATION THAT LEAVES NO WRONGS GO UNPUNISHED EVER! http://www.policeuniforms hame.blogspot.c... http://the-bastard.com/in dex.php?section... http://www.guardian.co.uk /world/2009/apr... http://www.jihadwatch.org /archives/02436... http://www.youtube.com/wa tch?v=p6V3oUoff... http://www.youtube.com/wa tch?v=1N3ySmBP5... http://www.youtube.com/wa tch?v=wnhiRS37e... http://leejohnbarnes.blog spot.com/2009/0... http://www.boingboing.net /2008/07/22/rac... http://www.theanswerbank. co.uk/Law/Quest... http://www.privacyhackers .blogspot.com http://www.ukcorruptionto day.com/index_f... http://video.google.co.uk /videosearch?hl... http://www.countercurrent s.org/uk-ingram... http://www.articlearchive s.com/internati... http://www.urban75.org/ph otos/photograph... http://blogcritics.org/ar chives/2005/09/... http://yourprivacyandyou. webs.com/Your%2... http://www.ephotozine.com /topic/t-54561 http://clearerchannel.org /drupal/?q=aggr... http://www.mcb.org.uk/med ia/presstext.ph... http://www.weeklygripe.co .uk/a430.asp http://www.pickledpolitic s.com/archives/... hhttp://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/aug20 05/race-a12.shtml http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/h i/uk/257693.stm http://www.socialistworke r.co.uk/art.php... http://www.greenpeace.org .uk/blog/about/... http://digg.com/world_new s/How_British_P... http://uk.answers.yahoo.c om/question/ind... http://newsgroups.derkeil er.com/pdf/Arch... http://www.just-a-regular -guy.com/2009/0... http://www.reddit.com/r/t echnology/comme... Burke, J. and Warren, P. (2002). How mobile phones let spies see our every move. The Observer, October 13. http://observer.guardian. co.uk/uk_news/s... Bush, Steve. (2002, August 12). Radar with Cell Phones? Look at CellDar. http://3nw.com/pda/radar_ with_cell_phone... Bush, Steve. (2006, November 17). Police will use radar to see through walls. Electronics Weekly. http://www.electronicswee kly.com/Article... Chan, Hans, H. (1999, June 4). Cops have eyes on x-ray vision. New technology would let police see through walls. New York: APBNews.com. http://www.angelfire.com/ nj3/soundweapon... Hearn, Kelly. (2001, April 18). High tech cop tools see through walls. United Press International cited on CommonDreams.org. http://www.commondreams.o rg/headlines01/... Hunt, A., Tillery, C., & Wild, N. (2001). Through-the-wall surveillance technologies. Corrections Today, 63(4), 132. Kuhn, M. G., & Anderson, R. J. (1998). Soft tempest: Hidden data transmission using electromagnetic emanations http://groups.csail.mit.e du/cis/crypto/c... Lamb, G. M. (2006). Does digital age spell privacy’s doom? Christian Science Monitor, 98(149). Lyon, D. (2001c). Surveillance after September 11. Surveillance after September 11. Sociological Research Online 6(3). http://www.socresonline.o rg.uk/6/3/lyon.... Marx, G. T. (1986). The iron fist and the velvet glove: Totalitarian potentials within democratic structures. http://web.mit.edu/gtmarx /www.iron.html Marx, G. T. (2001). Murky conceptual waters: The public and the private. Ethics and Information Technology, 3(3), 157-159. http://web.mit.edu/gtmarx /www/murkypubli... McGowan, Dave. (2000, June). Sony’s Magic cameras. http://www.davesweb.cncho st.com/cameras.... Mejia, R. (2002). More surveillance on the way. The Nation, October 30. http://www.thenation.com/ doc/20021111/me... Miles, Donna (2006, January 3). New device will sense through concrete walls. American Forces Information Service. US Department of Defense. http://www.defenselink.mi l/news/Jan2006/... Sanders, Jane (2001, April 12). Flash of force: Radar flashlight could help police detect suspects hiding behind doors and 8-inch thick walls. Georgia Institute of Technology Research News. http://gtresearchnews.gat ech.edu/newsrel... Simonite, Tom. (2006, November 14). Compact radar tracks movement through a wall. New Scientist. http://www.newscientistte ch.com/channel/... Wright, J. (2005). National security, corporate security, or human security? http://globalresearch.ca/ articles/WRI506... Alder, G.S. and Ambrose, M.L. (2005b). ‘An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97: 161–177. Alge, B.J. (1999). ‘The role of fairness and privacy in electronic performance monitoring and control systems: some preliminary findings’. Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL, August. Alge, B.J. (2001). ‘Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 7, 797–804. Alge, B.J. and Ballinger, G. (2001). ‘Electronic workplace surveillance: the effects of advanced notice and task discretion on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice’. Paper presented at the 2001 Meeting of the Society for industrial/Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA, April. David Zweig and Kristyn Scott (2007) When unfairness matters most: supervisory violations of electronic monitoring practices Human Resource Management Journal, Vol 17, no 3, 2007, pages 227–247 THE EXPOSURE OF THE UGLY DEEDS OF BRITISH POLICE HAS PUNCHED THE BRITISH POLICE THAT IS REFLECTED IN THEIR SCREAMING WAILING SIRENS AND USING THEIR INSIDER INFORMERS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO INFILTRATE INTO INTERNET AND HONK CAR HORNS AND TALK LOUDLY IN NEIHGBORHOOD HACKING INTERNET EACH TIME THEIR UGLY DEEDS ARE BEING EXPOSED. https://mango.safe-mail.n et/cgi-bin/Safe... https://www.blogger.com/c omment.g?blogID... http://theskeksis.proboar ds46.com/index.... http://tansjosephboard.pr oboards46.com/i... http://occupations.proboa rds.com/index.c... http://occupations.proboa rds.com/index.c... http://jukwaani.proboards 49.com/index.cg... http://pafr.proboards107. com/index.cgi?a... http://lothlorien12.probo ards45.com/inde... http://ashcraig.proboards 102.com/index.c... http://ragingbull.quote.c om/mboard/login... http://www.webclassifieds .us/300035/Rela... http://officialmbaguide.o rg/forum/forumd... http://www.usnetads.com/v iew/adId/673643... http://www.vivastreet.co. uk/posting_revi... http://cyprianascorner736 24.yuku.com/top... http://www.global-free-cl assified-ads.co... http://www.global-free-cl assified-ads.co... http://www.voy.com/220093/ http://www.expertlaw.com/ forums/showthre... http://www.freeadvertisin gforum.com/link... http://www.voy.com/153817 /12579.html http://boards.cruisecriti c.com/forumdisp... http://boards.cruisecriti c.com/showthrea... http://www.bbayani.proboa rds.com/index.c... http://my.kfoxtv.com/_Rac ism-is-an-ugly-... http://sneha548.wordpress.com/ http://en.forums.wordpres s.com/topic/rac... http://board.talibkweli.c om/index.php http://www.voy.com/

even in rape i dont relly think it should be allowed. the child could be put up for adoption. you dont kill life.

I think that, even though it is not the child's fault, mothers who have been involved in horrific incidents such as rape or incest,etc should be allowed abortion. In saying this, I think abortion should be done as soon as possible because at the current allowance for abortion-24weeks-some babies who have been born prematurely have survived from this age.

Abortion is a horrific act against a vulnerable human, based off of self-absorbed thoughts and wants, in which a mother gives permission to another to rid her child of his/her life, because it is an inconvenience and/or shame to her. Abortion steals the one unalienable right that is needed to possess the others. How is one expected to enjoy the right of liberty and to pursue happiness (and other unnamed rights), when he is lacking life?
"We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness..." ^1
From the aforesaid one can conclude that every human possesses these rights. Now comes forth the question: who has the right to deprive another of these privileges? Since every human has these rights, they share equality; no human possesses more rights than the others. If one holds the right to deprive others of their privileges, the equality , that is supposedly shared throughout the human race, does not exist Equality cannot exist when one human has more, or less, rights than another, and when one is above the others with the power to deprive them of their rights.
"A state also of equality wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one being more than another, there being nothing more evident than that creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of Nature, and the use of the same faculties, should be equal amongst another, without the subordination or subjection...." ^2
Whether a human has sovereignty or not, he is still equal to others. It is a matter of whether he has the power to deprive others of their unalienable rights. When a mother decides to have an abortion, she is making the decision to take the most crucial, unalienable right from her own child. She is also deciding that the child is on a level of inferiority, that the child's life holds a value less than equal to her own. Equality is abused time and again when a mother makes the decision to abort her child. Are humans truly equal to one another? Why are they allowed to devalue each other in such a horrendous way?
"Though this be a state of Liberty, yet it is not a state of license; though man in that state have an uncontrollable liberty to dispose or his person or possessions, yet he has not the liberty to destroy himself, or so much as any creature in his possession..... There cannot be supposed any such subordination among us that may authorize us to destroy one another, as if we were made for one another's uses, as inferior ranks of creations are for ours." ^3
No human should have the right to take the property of another. Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness, and other unnamed rights cannot be taken away from another without one committing a serious offense.
Equality should be shared throughout the human race, for every man should possess the same unalienable rights. No human should hold the right to deprive others of their aforesaid privileges. Any human that decides when another should die is abusing equality and another's right to life.
"The State of Nature has a Law of Nature to govern it, which obliges every one, and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal..., no one ought to harm another of his life, health, liberty, or possessions..." ^4
Every human should have the unalienable rights whether he is independent or dependent. Is the state of Life ruled by survival of the fittest? If so, no child would ever live to see a day.
Does it not state in the United States of America's Declaration of Independence that every human is equal and has the unalienable rights? How is it that the human race has come to the decision that every mother has the right to choose when her own child dies? Why is it that a human, equal to all other humans, has the right to deprive another, he/she is equal to, of his/ her unalienable rights? Is the child not human? Is the child's life so insignificant that the child does not deserve to possess the unalienable rights that should not be denied of any human? Is the child so inferior that his/her life does not have value? Why is a vulnerable human, a defenseless child, not equal to other humans? Why do so many humans disrespect the lives of the unborn? How can any human demand respect when he/she is unwilling to give some to another? Where is Human Dignity? Where is Equality? Why does there exist a law against the destruction of an eagle's egg but no law against the destruction of an unborn child? WHY IS ABORTION LEGAL?

^1: United States of America's Declaration of Independence
^2: John Locke, Second Treatise on Government, Chapter II: State of Nature.
^3: Locke, II.
^4: Locke, II.

abortion should only be for those victims of incest,rape or if the mothers life is in danger

your body your choice.

At 15, I was brutially raped and got pregnant... I got an abortion and I DON'T regret it at all... I was going to kill myself rather than bring that THING into the world... Yes I said THING! I had no choice in the matter sex... I was a baby myself. I was going insane because of the rape and baring his child was too much for me to take.

Several years ago, I was married and became pregnant but unfortunatly, my husband ran off with another woman and left me with no money or home, just the clothes on my back and what was in 2 suit cases... I was only making enough money for myself let alone a child too... so I decided to place the child in adoption... here's the Kicker... I was actually reviled for doing so. I got comments like.."Why are you throwing your child away?" "It would be better if you just abort it if you don't love it." that one come from a Pro-lifer and Yes I do love her.
She is with a great family who loves her and cares for her... I get photos and letter about her. I still love her even though I couldn't be her mother. I don't regret giving her up because she has what I couldn't give her at the time.
This year at the age 36, I gave birth to a baby boy who I deeply love and I am in a loving and stable relationship. The happiest I have every been!

Why I say all this is... DON'T judge others unless you see things from where they stand... not from where you do. You may be surprised!

I urge you to visit www.abortionno.org & www.abortionfacts.com. This will show you EVERYTHING you need to know about this subject. Abortion is murder, no matter what reason it is done for. It still hurts the baby, AND the woman, just as it did years ago when it was legal. Despite it being legal, there are still unprofessional practices that provide abortions. People today still experience the same ill effects through a legal clinic, that they did with the illegal clinics. I know a few pple who have had abortions, and they went nuts in the head. I know of a person who was raped and had an abortion, yet she suffers from that. I know of a person who was raped at 14, and kept the child against her mothers wishes. She never regretted not having an abortion. ALL of the women who have had abortions were hurt, and their lives have been plagued by the fact they went to "solve" their "problem", only to realize it wasn't the child who was the "problem." The abortion made a problem for them. The last time I checked, running from problems didn't solve anything, it only makes things worse. Only by facing hardships can we overcome them. Why have a baby killed for our actions, or an action of the person who violated us? There is just no excuse for it.

im onley a teenager and i have heard many stories online and on tv about women regreting they had an abortion its might be hard 2 keep the baby if you were rapped but think about the baby and who your taking away the chance for that baby to have life i belive that babys that are that still in the tummy are still babys not just a cell. god created that baby pls dont take that chance for that life 2 live.

My thoughts on this matter are hard to put into words, but I am going to try. Disclaimer: My opinion is not religiosly based in any way shape form or fashion.
First, I do NOT believe in abortion for me. The first time I got pregnant I was 16 years old, my daughter is now 17 getting ready to graduate from High School and go to college, I made the choice to have my baby and raise her. And have never regretted it. I had a miscarriage in 1998, I greived for my baby, and I was only 6 weeks pregnant. Then about a month later I recieved the bill from my physician for the DNC (I think that is the correct abbreviation) On that bill the word's "partial abortion" were typed and I greived again. Just from reading that word it broke my heart.
My daughter, my husband and I had this very conversation the other day. I guess I would be considered a believer in "Pro-Choice" just because of the fact that I have heard and read about the abortions done in back alleys before abortion was made legal. Women died of infections, babies were aborted at all terms of pregnancy and suffered because they were cut up. At least with the legalization of abortion the suffering of unborn babies was stopped, because there were rules made to go along with it's legalization.
To me a baby is a baby (life) at conception, but the majority of the medical society see's a baby as cells until the about 6 weeks old. These cells are known as a zygote and basically it is just a clump, which has no form or heartbeat. That is why girls and women are told it is tissue.
I do believe that females should be "informed" correctly, not just told "It is just tissue." I also think they should talk with others who have gone through with an abortion to hear the affects it has on their bodies and minds before they are allowed to go through with the procedure. I also feel like they should know the other options, because just like someone below says, there are so many women out there that want babies and can't have them for so many reason's. Abortion is one of those reason's. I don't believe abortion should be the fix all for an unplanned pregnancy. And I do believe that parental consent for teenagers should be required. I guess, I believe there should be a screening of sorts that has to be done before an abortion can be performed. That wouldn't be taking the right or freedom of that choice away but it would allow the mother time to really think about it before she done this.
On another note as far as the father's go, I feel that the father should be informed and help make the decision and if the parent's are not in agreement then there should be further steps taken.

HERE IS A VERY GOOD SITE: HTTP://WWW.ABORTIONNO.ORG.

We have a National Petition for the Right to Life that we are Taking to the Supreme Court

http://savethesouls.org

Abortion is just wrong there is many women out there dying to have children. Then theres women out there that have a few abortions under their belt because it was a little inconvenient for "life". Well that sickens me I dont feel that abortion should be a choice its not right if you didnt want a child then you should have kept your legs close because you knew it could happen. Abortion only seems right in two cases that are proven: rape and incest those people should have the choice because they didnt concent.

I believe if a woman has an abortion,she took a life. If abortion is outlawed, and the woman kills her unborn baby on purpose, she should suffer the consequences of her actions such as any other person who kills another would.

If it's a "womans choice" to abort, where is the childs or fathers choice? I see no "choice" in the matter. All I see is terrorism in it. Terrorists mutilate their own, abortion is a done in the same type of manner of dismembering human tissue, but is supported by clinics and people here in America. Abortion has many ill-effects, and a very small percentage of people who have abortions, have them because of life threatening issues, or rape.

I'm not American, I'm British.
But I support this protest.
Anti-abortion and Pro-Life!
From the moment of conception it is a 'baby' not a 'fetus' - don't discard human life! It has the potential to be something amazing!
Give 'unwanted' babies up for adoption. These people may not be able to have children, but this baby will be a gift they will cherish and love.
Yes, mothers do have a choice to make for themselves, but make the unselfish one and preserve the life of the little baby.
They cannot speak for themselves, let us be their mouths!
Stephanie

Having an abortion doesn't make you 'un-pregnant' it makes you the mother of a dead baby. The slaughter of innocent babies needs to be made illegal. Permanently.

I do not want to see unwanted babies die. But I do believe that EVERYONE should have a choice. You give people choice, they will almost always choose the right way...no choice and they look for the wrong way.

If we could get children not to have sex of any kind thier lives would be so much better. something to look forward after marriage. In this day in age we do not make our children wait nor want for much..so if they want to drink/have sex/it is hard them to understand NO No No you must wait for those things...
we as parents have to learn to wait and teach our children you can't have everything you want....

I think that if women don't want to have a child they shouldn't have sex in the first place. That's the choice right there! I don't think anyone has the right to decide when a life ends!
I understand that in some circumstances some things go wrong and then it's either the mother lives or the baby. In that situation there is a choice. It's one life or another.
Every human has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Without life, you can't have the other two. I don't see how someone can think that it's alright to take a human being's life.
Obviously, sometimes a woman is raped and then becomes pregnant. Being raped is a horrible crime and the woman goes through much trauma. However, that doesn't give her a right to hurt another human being because of what has happened to her. Also,there have been women who have been raped,get an abortion, and then end up in counseling not because of the rape, but because of the abortion.
Personally, I'm against abortion. I think that teens should just be more responsible and not have sex unless they're willing to accept the consequences.

ooooooo engrish.com <-----hilarious website? i think so. haha.
http://www.engrish.com/de tail.php?imagen...
http://www.engrish.com/de tail.php?imagen...

I'm all for comprehensive sex education (though I'm not sure if that's what's meant by "right sex education" here), but I'm also pro-choice. I do have moral issues with abortion, I believe the fetus is a life and should be given a chance to live, and I would never get an abortion myself. But at the same time, making abortion illegal harms far more people than it saves. Abortion will not go away if made illegal, it will simply be pushed back a few decades to coat hangers in back alleys, and women will die along with their unborn babies. Legal abortion means safe abortion, which seems much better than the alternative.