Get Widget

Stop Domain Name Parking and Cybersquatting

732 Signatures
  • Start Date:
    6-12-2007
  • Last Signed:
    1-22-2010

Description:

To ICANN President and CEO, Dr. Paul Twomey We, the undersigned, are concerned about domain name parking abuse and request that ICANN revisit the Anti-Cyberssquatting Consumer Protection Act and the Trademark Cyberpiracy Prevention Act to ensure that a domain names that are parked would be available for sale at a price tag that would not be considered extortion. We request that ‘Cybersquatting’ issues be discussed, reviewed and formalized this year into a written law to help stop the continuation of domain parking as an extortionist means that cause legitimate businesses to pay high price for the domain name.
Tell a FriendCreate a CampaignBookmark
Grow up babies. The free market will determine proper prices for domain names. Diamonds are in the ground and are just carbon. So Debeers should give them away. Stop crying and learn about supply and demand.
Nothing wrong with owning and parking domain names. The free market will set reasonable prices. Like the previous poster said, if you own land, it's up to you to build on it. And if you want to build but only can afford swamp land, then that's your choice. Grow up!
There is absolutely nothing wrong with domain name parking. Squatting - yes. Parking - no. Squatting should be outlawed... However, if you belive that parking should also be outlawed, then you are essentially stating that every person who owns real estate with no structure on it should release it back to the county because - oh, I dont know, YOU want that great corner lot with high traffic for YOUR OWN billboard. Parking does not equal Squatting. They are two completely different things. Period.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with domain name parking. Squatting - yes. Parking - no. Squatting should be outlawed... However, if you belive that parking should also be outlawed, then you are essentially stating that every person who owns real estate with no structure on it should release it back to the county because - oh, I dont know, YOU want that great corner lot with high traffic for YOUR OWN billboard. Parking does not equal Squatting. They are two completely different things. Period.
This is such a plague, I cannot believe this as been going on for so long. How would you like free parking spots being reserved by people that never show up? (but you could buy for $2,000 of course) Please stop this, it just doesn't make sense.
Please outlaw this practice. -Anthony Navarro - www.thatwordpressguy.com. More of my clients have had to settle for less than optimal names because their primaries were being held hostage.
I was thinking about this for long time now,and this practice is wrong and should be illegal. trying to register a domain , only to find one it's parked is a pain in the A##.
it's no different than concert scalping and that's illegal. Buying up domain names to resell them at a higher price to people isn't legitimate business, it's opportunistic extortion.
I agree!
I agree!
Nothing more irritating (and unfair) when you want to set-up a new website/company and find some company ripping you off because they managed to create some robot to steal it.
Squatters impede real progress and don't contribute any meaningful productivity increase, as cybersquatting is an economically non-productive activity. Since the registration of domain names is governed by a central body, there is an obvious requirement by that body to ensure domain name registration practices promote fair and open competition.
Domain parking is totally ridiculous and it needs to be stopped now! I totally agree with the petition above, I actually think they should pass laws that go even farther than that to also protect non-profit organizations and such but even that is still agood step foward that should be taken.
polospace.com costs $9,600. polospace.net can be registered for about 0.1% of that cost. This is definitely extortion.

FINALLY!! DIE DOMAIN NAME PARKERS! I ACTUALLY FOUND OUT THE ADDRESS OF A GUY WHO HAD MY NAME PARKED! FOUND OUT WHERE HE LIVED (1HR) FROM ME AND KICKED HE'S ASS! FELT GOOD! BUT STILL TOOK ME 4MONTHS TO LEGALY GET IT FROM HIM! HE TRIED TO SELL IT TO ME FOR 300US DOLLARS! HE HAD TO LET IT GO FOR 15 DOLLARS!

It's ridiculous & should be illegal.

I'd make $1000 bet that EVERY person on here who even lets slip they support this extortion has domains they are parking.

Check out this site, I thought maybe start a site named STOPdomain Parking, look who owns it

http://stopdomainparking. com/

Many keep a watch on this and just because all the parkers say it's ok, it makes it look debatable. It's NOT!! If you exclude anyone who has a domain parked, then EVERY single comment on this issue on any site would say it should be ILLEGAL!!

John Q I like this : "...going into a small, remote town, buying the general store and then closing it and waiting until someone is willing to buy it at a high price so that it can be re-opened" There is no benefit to the community at large it's just greed, and it would be stamped on if it wasn't a global internet problem.

Not sure how you can stop it but maybe capping the amount a domain can be transfered for might deter a few as it would mean they'd need to justify some other value in the transaction.

RE: Kitty K

Please refrain from comparing this to farm animals. It is NOT a fair comparison. Nor do Cybersquatting and domain parking increase traffic to a domain name. They actually do the opposite, as 1.) Google filters out such sites, putting your SEO at a disadvantage from the get-go, which actually results in a situation opposite to what you've described, and 2.) anyone who has landed on the site has most likely found something quite different from what they were looking for.

And no one should have to pay $20,000.00 for a domain name, which is what these squatters ask for some of the most commonly thought of domains.

In short, it's not capitalism. Capitalism benefits the consumer and the economy - this does neither. Nor is paying ~$15 for a domain then trying to pull thousands for it hard work. It is, indeed, a form of extortion. It goes unchecked because there are still so many gray and undetermined areas in the ethics of intellectual property. So, instead of calling people whiners, why don't you learn something about the internet and e-commerce before you go crazy at the keyboard.

My girlfriend wants to start up a small business online. After starting the business already with a name she chose carefully we find that the related domain name is being squatted (no website, never has been one!!). This is ridiculous, if the registrant is not using the domain they should be forced to release it.

Thanks for listening.

S. Stevenson, Australia

I agree. Kathleen

There is a major flaw in this petition, as stated "which is to stop the continuation of domain parking as an extortionist means that cause legitimate businesses to pay high price for the domain name." The problem is that when you venture out in domain name speculation, domain parking is one of the few legitimate ways of building up traffic for domain names. When a domain name goes up for auction it is not just the domain name that makes it a big seller, it has to have a very high volume traffic ranking. Legitimate businesses that do not have time to build up traffic for their site, go to the domain name auctions to buy the high traffic sites.

If a farmer buys a sickly calf, then invests time and patience in building up that calf into prize bull, is it extortion when the prize bull fetches close to a half million dollars at auction?

Please, do not sign this petition, because it will change the ways of capitalism, which is the hard work that a person does to gain a profit, to communism, where the whiners and slackers live off the hard work of the top 30 percent of the hardest workers.

History has shown the the economics of communism do not work.

I am trying to start an online community on literally a shoe-string budget. The names I was searching I was sure were too unique to have been registered, but I was wrong. Overall I have exhausted a list of about 12 names. And what makes it worse is that only 2 of the 12 are actually developed, the rest are parked, and that is the real crime here.

I've heard domain names are the new real estate, and having a real estate license, I have to agree. But there are some significant differences in that there are government bodies and regulations set up to encourage development so that land is put to the best and most efficient use. I don't see anything similar when it comes to domain names.

Call me crazy, but I don't think having the internet crammed with premium, parked domains that exist solely to sell advertising is the most effective use of the internet.

Signed

Squatting domains with no intention to use them is stifling companies that want to start businesses. I recently researched 5 variations of a name and was shocked to find every one, even grammatically incorrect variations were taken. Now I'm forced to come up with some random name like hulu, which will require my company to spend tons of money into marketing this name to associate it with the product.

I have worked in the entertainment internet world for a long time and was in charge of securing names for new shows and was appalled at how fast people would steal the names for movies they obviously were not going to produce... particularly those registered days after the film was announced. One of these squatters even had the audacity to offer it back for a premium sum.

The .com extension should be reserved for active businesses. Not pages with adsense all over them (which incidentally according to adsense rules is against the TOS). I think if you buy a .com name you will need to show intent to use the name appropriately within 6 months or forced to give it back.

It's speculation which is just a form of capitalism. Why not go after big money speculators who buy up houses that have been foreclosed on and resell them? Most domainers I know are just small business people, trying to earn a little extra money.

Buying houses is different, this is about buying up brands and business concepts. I can build a house and even copy another house brick by brick and no one is going to care or sue me. Domain names are unique brands and there are only so many grammatically correct variations out there and once someone has one it is gone. Im all for fair business practice but when people just sit on names in hopes of extorting them later or just making a few bucks on the side and barely even breaking even to keep the name this seems unfair to those who want the name and would like to start a business with good intentions.

Domain parking is criminal.

Economically speaking, domain parking is wasteful. It also hurts the economy by stifling business. Commerce would benefit greatly by preventing this activity. And it's painfully obvious that there is little benefit to the economy in allowing the activity. Condemning squatting has been at the top of my list of problems with the internet since I first became a web developer.

Domain parking is criminal.

My first thought was that people can invest how they choose, but then I went looking for some useful domain names to create actual sites with and discovered that the majority of the registered domain names are parked. I would be interested in seeing statistics on how many registered domain names have sites associated with them vs how many are simply parked

Loading People...